Subject: PIPA Disclosure: The latest case; Systematic inspections: vigilance during initial inspections
|
|
| 
| 
| March 2012 |
PIPA Disclosure - The latest case - Mahoney v Salt [2012] QSC 43 Mahoney v Salt is the latest in a string of cases dealing with a respondent’s disclosure obligations under the Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 (Qld). In this decision, the Queensland Supreme Court dismissed a claimant’s application for disclosure of two statements provided by the respondents to a loss adjuster, under instructions from a solicitor, for the purpose of defending the allegations of negligence against them. This decision follows the appeal decision of State of Queensland v Allen in November 2011 and the earlier decision of Felgate v Tucker , which have been discussed in previous newsletters.read more > |
Systematic inspections: vigilance during initial inspections. Strong v Woolworths Ltd [2012] HCA 5 The High Court has recently considered the issue of causation in the context of a supermarket slip and fall. The facts of the decision are straightforward. The plaintiff in the primary proceedings was a customer at the Centro Taree Shopping Centre. read more > |
|
|
| 
| FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT US | 
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| To tell us what you think of this newsletter, or to have your contact details updated, please contact the editor at privacy@carternewell.comThe material contained in this publication is in the nature of general comment only, and neither purports nor is intended, to be advice on any particular matter. No reader should act on the basis of any matter contained in this publication without considering and, if necessary, taking appropriate professional advice upon his or her own particular circumstances.Carter Newell 2010 | Privacy Statement | Disclaimer |
|
|
|
|
This email was sent to linda@ljgrealestate.com.au. If you are no longer interested you can unsubscribe instantly.
No comments:
Post a Comment