Friday, June 29, 2012

Why haven't the number of home sales & dwelling approvals movied in line with population growth?

Hello Friends, Clients & Associates,

The below is for your information, perusal and empowerment only with kind regards and best wishes:-

Why haven’t the number of home sales and dwelling approvals moved in line with population growth?

With the release of the latest building approvals data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics this week for April 2012 we are seeing no signs of improvement for the home building sector.  The lack of activity has a significant multiplier effect across the economy; not only is it those linked directly to the construction sector which suffer due to lower levels of construction but also retailers and service providers.  The slowdown isn’t only being felt in new housing, the number of established houses and units being sold are also tracking below average.

Although new construction and sales of existing properties has been trending lower for many years now, Australia’s population has continued to grow.  On an annual basis between the March 1994 quarter and the September 2011 quarter, Australia’s population has increased by 274,917 persons each year.  This increase in population also increases the requirement for homes in which to house these new individuals.  Population growth is currently 16.3% above the long-term average highlighting that despite population growth well below peak levels, it is well above average over recent times.

Looking at the annual volume of house and unit sales across Australia over the same period highlights this disconnect more specifically.   Annual sales volumes peaked over the September 2003 quarter with 617,962 sales for the year.  Ever since that time sales volumes have trended lower and as the previous chart shows, population growth has increased over that period.  Over the period from March 1994 to March 2012 the Australian housing market has averaged 472,504 sales each year.  This figure is -24% lower than the peak market activity however, it is -19.3% higher than the volume of sales over the 12 months to March 2012.  Transaction volumes have been below the long-term average since September 2010.

As already mentioned it hasn’t only been the decline in sales of existing homes which has been heading in the wrong direction in recent years but also the number of approvals for new dwellings.  Dwelling approvals peaked over the 12 months to September 1994 with 193,754 new homes approved for construction over the year.  Over the 12 months to March 2012 144,594 new dwellings were approved for construction which was -25% lower than the historic peak but also -9.1% lower than the long-term average of 159,043 approvals each year.

If the housing market was acting efficiently and affordability factors and government interference played no part you’d anticipate that sales volumes should have been increasing over time along with building approvals as the population has continued to grow.  Of course this has not been the case.  A restrictive supply of residential land, the slow process of gaining approvals for new development and the various government fees and charges associated with new development which are ultimately passed on to the purchaser have all contributed to a falling rate of new construction and fewer sales transactions.  Of course these aren’t the only factors, availability of credit for housing, the greater propensity for households to save rather than spend, housing affordability issues and taxes on moving such as stamp duty have also contributed to the persistent insufficient supply of new housing and a lower volume of home sales.

The most worrying factor is that population growth is already at a level well above the long term average and the more up-to-date overseas arrivals and departures data from the ABS shows that net long term arrivals are staring to increase once more which suggests population growth is set to accelerate over the coming quarters.

Of course, households are responding and we are seeing average household sizes increasing after they have trended lower for much of the last century and we are seeing children stay in the family home for longer.

In my opinion it would be good if we could see an action plan from all levels of government as to how we can tackle these issues.  We see many politicians come out and make bold statements about whether they believe in population growth or not and that is an important debate however, it is unlikely that our population will not grow.  What is an equally, if not more important debate, is how we are going to provide the necessary amount of housing to our population at an affordable price point (whether it be to rent or to buy) for all sectors of the community.

Housing is the responsibility of all three levels of government, with local government’s approving development proposals, state governments determining where development can take place and federal government to some degree managing population growth.  Consultation and coordination across all three levels of government is imperative to effectively manage housing supply.  It’s not just a housing undersupply which is apparent in Australia it is an undersupply of housing at an affordable price point and that is an issue which is going to be far more difficult to correct.

Best Regards,

Linda & Carlos Debello

LJ Gilland Real Estate Pty Ltd

http://twitter.com/GillandDebello

http://au.linkedin.com/lindajanedebello

http://www.facebook.com/pages/LJ Gilland Real Estate Pty Ltd

Confidential email:- The information in this message is intended for the recipient named on this email.  If you are not the recipient please do not read, copy, distribute or act upon the message as the information it contains may be privileged.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the writer by return email.  Thank you very much for your assistance in this matter and your co-operation.  Should you wish not to received research and interesting subject which the writer has contained in the email for your empowerment, please notify the writer of that as well as he/she only has your best interests at heart with thanks.  Have a great day!

Image005

RP DATA RESEARCH BLOG AS AT 29TH JUNE 2012

RP Data Research Blog - The top 20 most ‘crowded’ suburbs across Australia


The top 20 most ‘crowded’ suburbs across Australia

Posted: 28 Jun 2012 04:38 PM PDT

Where can you find the most people packed into one suburb?  According to the latest Census data, look no further than the inner Sydney suburb of Elizabeth Bay.  This suburb covers about one quarter of a square kilometre of prime Inner Sydney real estate and, according to the latest Census figures, is home to 5,093 persons which works out to be about 2 persons per 100 square metres of land.  The second most densely populated suburb in the country is right next door at Rushcutters Bay, with a comparatively sparse population density of 1.5 persons per 100 square metres.

Nineteen of Australia’s top twenty most densely populated suburbs are located in Sydney.  The one exception is Melbourne’s Southbank which ranks at number 19 in the population density stakes.

The table below shows the top 20 suburbs across Australia based on the highest population density on a rate/sqkm:

Interestingly, third on the top twenty list is the comparatively outer lying suburb of Wentworth Point which is located on the Parramatta River about 16km from the Sydney CBD.  The suburb was gazetted in 2009 and was previously part of the suburb of Homebush.   Having such a high population density outside of the inner city is quite uncommon for an Australian city (particularly outside of Sydney), however, as urban renewal projects and brownfield developments spread further away from the city centres, a greater level of population density in the middle ring suburbs is likely to become more common.

The spatial patterns of population density are generally centric to the inner city and follow the path of key transport infrastructure.  The trend is quite clear on the thematic maps below which include a 1km train station buffers overlay.  It makes sense that higher population densities will follow the established transport corridors; land along these routes is generally zoned for higher densities.  As transit oriented developments continue to gather pace I am quite certain we will see higher population densities spreading to key transport nodes located further away from the city centres.

Best Regards,

Linda & Carlos Debello

LJ Gilland Real Estate Pty Ltd

http://twitter.com/GillandDebello

http://au.linkedin.com/lindajanedebello

http://www.facebook.com/pages/LJ Gilland Real Estate Pty Ltd

Confidential email:- The information in this message is intended for the recipient named on this email.  If you are not the recipient please do not read, copy, distribute or act upon the message as the information it contains may be privileged.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the writer by return email.  Thank you very much for your assistance in this matter and your co-operation.  Should you wish not to received research and interesting subject which the writer has contained in the email for your empowerment, please notify the writer of that as well as he/she only has your best interests at heart with thanks.  Have a great day!

Image021

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Article of Interest for Friends, Clients & Associates of Linda and Carlos Debello, LJ Gilland Real Estate Pty Ltd

Australian housing at its most affordable level for nine years: Christopher Joye

By Christopher Joye
Thursday, 28 June 2012

In encouraging news for prospective property owners, Aussie housing continues to get cheaper when deflated using disposable incomes. According to Rismark, Australia’s all regions, average dwelling price-to-average disposable household income ratio has fallen to around four times, which is its lowest level since March 2003 (abstracting away from a temporary dip during the GFC).

This analysis is based on both “average” and “median” dwelling prices calculated using all home sales recorded across the country during the March quarter. The quarterly income estimates are extracted from the ABS’s National Accounts data, which publishes a regular “disposable household income” aggregate. To translate this figure into a “per household” unit, Rismark divides through by the number of households each quarter. It is important to remember here that this income estimate reflects that there are multiple income earners per household, and is an “average”, not a “median”, and likely to be biased upwards somewhat due to right-skew in the distribution of incomes.

Click to enlarge

The second chart below seeks to remove one of the main “non-cash” items that is captured in the ABS’s disposable household income series: “imputed” owner-occupied rents, or the rents you effectively save by buying a home rather than renting it. As you can see, this boosts the dwelling price-to-income ratio to about four and a half times.

Click to enlarge

The exact levels of the price-to-income ratio are relatively trivial: it is thechange in the ratio over time that affords much more useful insights.

From the analysis above we can infer several things. First, disposable household incomes in Australia have grown as quickly, if not more quickly, than nominal Australian house prices over the last nine years. Indeed, when we measure changes in house prices more precisely using a “hedonic regression” technique, we arrive at even lower house price inflation numbers. In particular, we find that disposable incomes have actually out-paced house prices by about 15% over this period.

A second learning is that the price-to-income ratio seems to have risen by about one-third from circa three times to four times since 1993. In fact, there was a very distinct regime change in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

There is a sound explanation for this innovation: the long-term cost of mortgage debt in Australia declined by north of 40% between 1980 and 1995, and 1995 and today. This was largely a function of the long-term reduction in realised inflation and measured inflation expectations, which in turn allowed Australia’s central bank, the RBA, to permanently lower its cash rate.

The radical reduction in the day-to-day cost of mortgage debt permitted Australian households to significantly increase the amount of debt they were servicing without a noticeable rise in underlying mortgage default rates. Notwithstanding a peak in headline mortgage rates of around 9.5% in August 2008, system-wide arrears have remained no higher than their last spike in 1994-95.

Here we are able to document another development. The striking rise in Australia’s household debt-to-income ratio from the mid-to-late 1990s onwards ceased altogether in about 2006, a year or two prior to the onset of the GFC. That is, credit growth started tracking income growth, which is what you would expect through the cycle. Households evidently discovered that they had maxed out their debt servicing capability, and rationally stopped leveraging up.

Rismark’s price-to-income ratio analysis does not, of course, account for changes in interest rates. Today mortgage rates are well below their long-term averages. You can get discounted variable rates as low as 5.6% per annum, and three-year fixed-rates at about 5.8% per annum.

Factoring in the change in both incomes and interest rates is important. As one exercise, Rismark took the median Australian dwelling price in 1985 and indexed it up by changes in per household disposable incomes and adjustments in borrowing capacity afforded by changes in mortgage rates (i.e., holding the repayment-to-income ratio constant).

Rismark found that they could explain 93% of the actual increase in median Australian house prices over the 1985 to 2011 period simply referencing these two variables.

Christopher Joye is a leading financial economist and a director of Rismark. The author may have an economic interest in any of the items discussed in this article. These are the author’s personal views and do not represent the opinions of any other individual or institution. This material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, investment advice or recommendations.

Best regards,

Image003
 

Linda J. Debello Licensee, LJ Gilland Real Estate Pty Ltd

Tel: (07) 3263 6085 | Mobile: 0409 995 578

www.ljgrealestate.com.au


Contact me:

Image015
ljgilland

My latest post:RP Data Research Blog – Is the housing market set to make a comeback? Subject: RP Data Research Blog – Is the housing market set to make a comeback? RP Data Rese...

Read more | My blog

  Get this email app!  

Please consider your environmental responsibility. Before printing this e-mail message, ask yourself whether you really need a hard copy.

Get a signature like this. CLICK HERE.